Current anthropology, 2011-08-01, Vol.52 (4), p.513-535
“Identity” is a key term for anthropological analysis today. This paper explores the challenge posed by modernist Buddhists in Nepal who participated in identity politics while grounding their claims to identity-based rights in belonging to a religious community defined by the doctrine that there is no such thing as a “self” in the conventional sense. Examining the sharp proliferation of identity-based discourses and claims in post-1990 Nepal in light of broader structural transformations associated with the globalization of neoliberal governance strategies and against the rise of a popular vipassana meditation movement, I suggest that the rise of ethnoreligious politics in Nepal at that time reflects the presence of a global “identity machine”—an apparatus that establishes not only the categories of identity recognized and claimed in democratic states but also, indeed, their very ontological foundations in liberal conceptions of self, citizenship, and social relations. Nepali Buddhists who claim religious rights while also engaging in practices that challenge the very idea of identity are at once participating in the ideological and institutional conditions of neoliberal modernity and also reworking these in unexpected ways. This paradox calls on anthropologists to study the processes that produce and extend particular ways of seeing and organizing the world rather than inadvertently naturalizing them.
Ethnic identity ; Theravada ; Buddhism ; Special Section: Keywords ; Democracy ; Identity theory ; Political anthropology ; Economic liberalism ; Political identity ; Group identity ; Liberalism ; Asia ; Religion, magic, witchcraft ; Specific concepts ; Ethnology ; Religions, beliefs, worships ; Generalities ; Sources and methods ; Political activity ; Buddhists ; Civil rights ; Research ; Identity
JSTOR Arts & Sciences I
Permalink to record
http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25550568$$DView record in Pascal Francis